In establishing who was behind the shooting down of
MH17, there are a number of central issues as well as factual evidence
which cannot be overlooked:
1. Malaysian
Airlines confirmed that the pilot was instructed to fly at a lower
altitude by the
2. The flight path was changed. We still don’t know who ordered it, but we
know it was notEurocontrol:
MH17 was diverted from the normal South Easterly
route over the sea of Azov to a path over the
According to Malaysian Airlines “The usual
flight route [across the sea of Azov] was earlier declared safe by the
International Civil Aviation Organisation. The International Air Transportation
Association has stated that the airspace the aircraft was traversing was
not subject to restrictions.”
…
The regular flight path of MH17 (and other
international flights) over a period of ten days prior to July 17th (
day of the disaster), crossing Eastern Ukraine in a Southeasterly direction
is across the Sea of Azov (click on the article link below to see the map).
While the audio records of the MH17 flight have been confiscated by the Kiev
government, the order to change the flight path did not come from Eurocontrol.
Did this order to change the flight path come from the Ukrainian authorities?
Was the pilot instructed to change course? (Malaysian Airlines MH17 Was
Ordered to Fly over the East Ukraine Warzone)
3. The presence of the Ukrainian
military jet was confirmed by Spanish air traffic controller “Carlos” at Kiev
Borispol airport shortly after the plane was shot down, as well as eyewitnesses
in Donetsk. (How American Propaganda
Works: “Guilt By Insinuation”, Spanish Air Controller @
Kiev Borispol Airport: Ukraine Military Shot Down Boeing MH#17
The Spanish air traffic controller documented the
event on Twitter as it happened. He claimed it was not an accident, that the
Ukrainian authorities shot down MH17 and were trying to “make it look like an
attack by pro-Russians” . His Twitter account was closed down shortly
after the tragedy. Although his account has yet to be fully corroborated, some
of his claims have been confirmed by Malaysian Airlines and the Russian
authorities.
There have been some
reports to the effect the Spanish Air controller is fake and that the twitter message were sent out of
4.
a) Kiev’s regime deployed anti-air missile systems
in Donetsk in and around the area where flight MH17 crashed.
b) An Ukrainian warplane SU-25 trailing flight MH17
c) the report pointed to the possibility of an
air-to-air attack on MH17
d) the report also pointed to inconsistencies
pertaining to the reports of the Ukrainian air traffic control
The Russian authorities did not come to any
conclusion regarding who was to blame for shooting down the plane. (MH17 Show & Tell: It’s
the West’s Turn – Russian Satellites and Radars Contradict West’s Baseless
Claims)
5. The U.S., despite its global spying apparatus,
has not shown any radar or satellite imagery to back its claim that Russia and
the Eastern-Ukrainian opposition are responsible for the downing of MH17. The evidence it has presented so far is weak
and based on pro-Kiev documents consisting of YouTube videos and various
social media – “all of which are admittedly unverifiable and some of which is
veritably fabricated.”:
Is US intelligence simply reading blogs? Or are the
blogs somehow a clearinghouse of US intelligence? Or are the blogs fabrications
by US intelligence in an attempt to frame Russia? One in particular, “Ukraine at War,” is a definitive collection of fabrications,
biased propaganda, and dubious claims that appear to precede “US intelligence”
claims. (Assigning Blame to East
Ukraine Rebels: US Appeals to “Law of the Jungle” in MH17 Case)
6. “The Russian Defense Ministry pointed out that
at the moment of destruction of MH-17 an American satellite was flying over the
area”:
The Russian government urges Washington to make
available the photos and data captured by the satellite.(How American Propaganda Works: “Guilt By Insinuation”)
7. A U.S. intelligence source claimed the
“U.S. intelligence agencies do have detailed satellite images of the likely
missile battery that launched the fateful missile, but the battery appears to
have been under the control of Ukrainian government troops dressed in what look
like Ukrainian uniforms”. These images
could confirm the evidence presented by Russia to the effect that Kiev’s
regime deployed anti-air missile systems in Donetsk in and around the area
where flight MH17 crashed. (Fact number 4, Whistleblower: U.S.
Satellite Images Show Ukrainian Troops Shooting Down MH17)
8. Russia called for an expert independent investigation:
President Putin has repeatedly stressed that the
investigation of MH-17 requires “a fully representative group of experts to be
working at the site under the guidance of the International Civil Aviation
Organization (ICAO).” Putin’s call for an independent expert examination
by ICAO does not sound like a person with anything to hide. (How American Propaganda
Works: “Guilt By Insinuation”)
9. The U.S. claimed, without evidence, but “with
confidence” that Russia was involved:
[On July 20, the US Secretary of State, John
Kerry confirmed that pro-Russian separatists were involved in the downing of
the Malaysian airliner and said that it was “pretty clear” that Russia was
involved. Here are Kerry’s words: “It’s pretty clear that this is a
system that was transferred from Russia into the hands of separatists. We know
with confidence, with confidence, that the Ukrainians did not have such a
system anywhere near the vicinity at that point and time, so it obviously
points a very clear finger at the separatists.” (Ibid.)
10. U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry's statement
above regarding Russian involvement is contradicted by the Russian satellite
photos and numerous eye witnesses on the ground. (Ibid.)
11. US intelligence officials said there is no evidence of
the Russian government’s involvement, also contradicting John Kerry's statement
above. (US Intelligence on Malaysian
Flight MH17: Russia Didn’t Do It. “US Satellite Photos do not Support Obama’s
Lies”, The author
refers to this news item by the Associated Press: US INTELLIGENCE: No 'Direct'
Russian Involvement In Downing Of MH17)
12. A few hours after the crash, Kiev authorities
presented a video in which the opposition admitted shooting down the plane.
Experts who studied the video concluded that it was a fabrication:
“The tape’s second fragment consists of three
pieces but was presented as a single audio recording. However, a spectral and
time analysis has showed that the dialog was cut into pieces and then
assembled. Short pauses in the tape are very indicative: the audio file has
preserved time marks which show that the dialog was assembled from various
episodes.” (Ibid.)
The encoding of the video file shows it
was created on July 16, the day before the plane was shot down. This
information remains to be confirmed, but if it is accurate, it would mean that
the Ukrainian authorities shot the plane down and fabricated evidence to frame
the opposition (Did Ukraine Fabricate
Evidence to Frame Russia for MH17 Shoot Down?, How American Propaganda
Works: “Guilt By Insinuation”)
13. John Kerry “referred to a video that the
Ukrainians have made public showing an SA-11 unit heading back to Russia after
the downing of the plane with 'a missing missile or so.'” The video was
“posted on the Facebook account of the Ukrainian Interior Minister.”According
to numerous sources the video was “taken in or near Krasnoarmeisk”, a town
under Kiev's control since May and located “ 120 kilometers from the Russian
border and 80 kilometers from where the Malaysian Boeing 777 crashed”:
At least one other clip of the “Russian Buk” that
has been made available also suggests that the Ukrainians are showing their own
equipment. I’m still working on researching that one for you. (Key Piece of Video
“Evidence” for Russian Responsibility for Malaysian Plane Shootdown Debunked)
14. Ukrainian Prosecutor-General Vitaly Yarema said
the Ukrainian opposition did not possess a Buk missile system:
“Ukrainian Interior Minister Anton Gerashchenko
said on July 17 that the Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 airliner had been downed
by the Buk missile system...Ukrainian Prosecutor-General Vitaly Yarema told
Ukrainian Pravda newspaper on Friday: 'After the passenger airliner was downed,
the military reported to the president that terrorists do not have our air
defense missile systems Buk and S-300... These weapons were not seized'” (Militias Do Not Have
Ukrainian Buk Missile System — Ukraine General Prosecutor)
15. The MH17 incident is used to wage economic
war against Russia. Sanctions imposed in the wake of the event, without any
evidence of Russian implication, are used to weaken the ruble and destabilize
the Russian Monetary system. (The Malaysian Airlines MH17
Crash: Financial Warfare --against Russia, Multibillion Dollar Bonanza for Wall
Street)
16. In 1962, the U.S. Joint Chief of Staff planned
Operation Northwoods, a secret "false flag operation" (declassified)
in which a civilian airliner was to be shot down and blamed on the Cuban
government. The objective was to manufacture a pretext to wage war on
Cuba. (The
Implementation of Operations Northwoods was turned down by President John F.
Kennedy).
The downing of MH17 and the reaction of the US
authorities and media bear strong similarities with the scenario depicted in
Operation Northwoods, according to author R. Teichmann:
"Among other things the document proposed the
following. I [Teichman] have inserted in bold (in parenthesis) my comments to
illustrate why the MH-17 incident could be a re-run of the proposed Operation
Northwoods:
It is possible to create an incident which will
demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban aircraft (a BuK
Anti-Aircraft missile system supplied by Russia to the ‘Separatists” in eastern
Ukraine) has attacked and shot down a chartered civil airliner (Malaysian
Airlines MH-17) en route from the United States (Amsterdam,
Schipol airport) to Jamaica, Guatemala, Panama, or Venezuela (Kuala
Lumpur) .
It is possible to create an incident which will
make it appear that Communist Cuban MIGs (Eastern Ukraine
‘Separatists’) have destroyed a USAF aircraft (Malaysian
passenger aircraft) over international waters (their
territory) in an unprovoked attack. (Framing Russia? Fabricating
a Pretext to Wage War: Flight MH-17 and “Operation Northwoods”)
Related Articles:
http://truthcdm.com/malaysian-airlines-mh17-who-stands-to-gain/
http://truthcdm.com/mh17-sacrificed-airliner-the-new-cold-war/
http://truthcdm.com/kiev-source-ukraine-accidentally-shot-down-mh17-during-exercises/
Global Research, July 26, 2014
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-malaysian-airline-mh17-crash-sixteen-central-issues-which-cannot-be-ignored/5393296